Democrats assault Iraq war’s political support
Jan Triana posted the following comment on my post regarding Rumsfeld’s up-armored Humvee flap.
Au contraire, Jan, I’m convinced that the complainers understand these factors well enough. In my view anybody who spent a little time would have sufficient hand on this material and wouldn't be complaining they way they are.
I fully believe that these complaints are not genuine complaints but instead just a means to attack Bush. Put another way, Modern Democrats never seem to give a damn about the military unless they are trying to cut it. What they actually want to do make the war so unpopular that Bush is forced to withdraw from Iraq.
If successful at tanking this war the Democrats will try to destroy Bush by claiming he "lost the war"; a war that they actively and deliberately undermined the political support for.
This is why the Democrats pretended to be so excited about “autopen-gate”. They really don’t give a damn about the military; they just want to destroy this war and Bush. Their transparent, feigned outrage over autopen-signed condolence letters is nothing but a naked attack on this war’s political support.
Can anyone stomach their pious platitudes over autopen-signed condolence letters to families of the solders that they have nothing but contempt for in the first place?
Ann Coulter snickered at their crocodile tears:
No, it’s not that there isn’t gnat that’s too small for these Democratic surrender monkeys to choke on. Nobody who ran a presidential candidate that sided with our enemy during a time of war to be a wartime president could give a damn about our troops anyway. It’s all about attacking this war’s political support.
These flaps over up-armored Humvees and the autopen-signed condolence letters are merely the ammunition leftists are using against our own troops.
Personally I think Rumsfield has done an exemplery job. People just don't get it. They look at a bit and don't have a clue of the whole picture.
Au contraire, Jan, I’m convinced that the complainers understand these factors well enough. In my view anybody who spent a little time would have sufficient hand on this material and wouldn't be complaining they way they are.
I fully believe that these complaints are not genuine complaints but instead just a means to attack Bush. Put another way, Modern Democrats never seem to give a damn about the military unless they are trying to cut it. What they actually want to do make the war so unpopular that Bush is forced to withdraw from Iraq.
If successful at tanking this war the Democrats will try to destroy Bush by claiming he "lost the war"; a war that they actively and deliberately undermined the political support for.
This is why the Democrats pretended to be so excited about “autopen-gate”. They really don’t give a damn about the military; they just want to destroy this war and Bush. Their transparent, feigned outrage over autopen-signed condolence letters is nothing but a naked attack on this war’s political support.
Can anyone stomach their pious platitudes over autopen-signed condolence letters to families of the solders that they have nothing but contempt for in the first place?
Ann Coulter snickered at their crocodile tears:
Since the attack of 9-11, we've won two wars, liberated millions of people from monstrous regimes, presided over one election in Afghanistan and are about to see elections in Iraq and among the Palestinian people. Focusing like a laser beam on the big picture, liberals are upset that, during this period, the secretary of defense used an autopen.
No, it’s not that there isn’t gnat that’s too small for these Democratic surrender monkeys to choke on. Nobody who ran a presidential candidate that sided with our enemy during a time of war to be a wartime president could give a damn about our troops anyway. It’s all about attacking this war’s political support.
These flaps over up-armored Humvees and the autopen-signed condolence letters are merely the ammunition leftists are using against our own troops.
posted by johnh | 9:32 AM
<< Home