But why are they letting the UN keep the other 90%?

New York Post has an article titled Bush in Backhand Diss of Beleaguered Kofi

“Backhand Diss” of Annan? I would have preferred to see a full frontal boot to his crotch. Now that, Annan, would be an example of an illegal war.

December 3, 2004 -- President Bush withheld support for embattled U.N. Secretary-General Kofi Annan yesterday and demanded the world body produce a 'full and fair' accounting of the Iraq oil-for-food scandal.

The United States broke with other nations on the U.N. Security Council, including Britain, Russia, France, Germany and China, which announced their support for Annan.

Uh, why is Britain supporting Annan, stupidity or malice?

I'm sure malice is at least part of the reason for Russia, France, Germany and China to support Annan, but the primary reason is that they are all part of the same caper. Annan is sure to avenge himself by reveal all information he has on any participant in the Oil for UNSC vetoes scandal who is fool enough to join with Bush.

Russia, France, Germany and China (the gang of four), are of course, in a deathmatch with Bush. They would side with Annan anyway.

Which brings me back to wondering why Britain is siding with our enemies?

Meanwhile, in Albany, the Republican-led state Senate dealt a severe blow to a U.N. plan to build a 35-story building on nearby parkland, tabling a bill that would have started the process.

The United Nations 'has evolved into an anti-Israel, anti-Semitic group of petty, sniping bigots who are pursuing an anti-freedom, anti-democratic, anti-American agenda,' said state Sen. Serphin Maltese, a conservative Republican from Queens. 'To authorize an expansion of their headquarters would be a slap in the face of American citizens.'

Yup, makes sense to me.

Meanwhile, GOP Reps. Vito Fossella, Peter King, and Sue Kelly called a press conference in front of U.N. headquarters, endorsing legislation calling for cutting 10 percent of U.S. funding for the United Nations unless it cooperates with investigators probing the oil-for-food scandal. "

Only 10%? I have no problem with keeping that 10%, I'm insulted that they proposing to give the UN any of the remaining 90%.